Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable writing brief with concrete templates, quantitative thresholds, and a validation checklist. It stays lean and assumes competence; the main improvement area is tighter conciseness and slightly more explicit error-recovery guidance in the workflow.
Suggestions
Tighten the '好的开篇' and '好的洞察句式' example blocks to 1–2 lines each to reduce tokens further.
Add a brief error-recovery step in Step 1 (e.g., what to do if searches return <5 useful leads after the补充 round).
Consider moving the style-guide examples and 要避免的 list into a references/style-guide.md to improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, instructional body with templates, a specs table, and a checklist that assume Claude's competence; a few example sections could be trimmed, so it is efficient rather than maximally lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-ready guidance: search-query templates, output path pattern with filename example, structure template, word-count range, style do/don't pairs, and a self-check checklist covering common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 4-step sequence (搜集→提炼→撰写→保存) with quantitative checkpoints (3–5 searches, 5条以上线索, 600–900字) and a self-check checklist as validation; minor gaps in explicit error-recovery feedback keep it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with clear headers and no nested references; the skill is self-contained with no bundle files, so content is appropriately inline, though the style-guide/示例 material could be externalized for cleaner separation. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |