Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable skill body with excellent progressive disclosure and concrete executable guidance. Main room for improvement is making validation checkpoints inline within the workflow steps rather than consolidated in Critical Rules.
Suggestions
Move the 二次搜索核验 verification into Step 3/Step 5 as an inline checkpoint (validate -> re-search -> fix) to strengthen the feedback loop and push workflow_clarity toward 5.
Trim the Output Template to the minimal skeleton and reference the format details from a reference file to tighten conciseness.
Add an explicit dedup-result sanity check between Step 2 and Step 3 so the batch-processing validation is visible inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean body that assumes Claude's competence without explaining known concepts; the Output Template adds justified length but has minor instances that could be trimmed, so not a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully actionable instruction skill: exact tool name 'mcp__MiniMax__web_search', copy-paste query template '<主题中文> <主题英文> 最近3天 新闻', exact file path 'markdown/<YYYY-MM-DD>_投资者新闻影响日报.md', and a concrete output template. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six clearly sequenced steps with validation present (Step 2 dedup/age filter, Critical Rule 2 二次搜索核验), so the batch-operation cap does not apply; checkpoints are distributed across Critical Rules rather than inline feedback loops, keeping it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with one-level-deep references (topics.md, impact-framework.md, diagram-patterns.md — all verified present) and explicit per-reference 'when to load' guidance ('Step 1 抓取前必读', 'Step 5 推演时...加载'), matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |