Content
62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A rich, highly actionable persona skill with an unusually strong validation loop (question triage → mandated research → 6-item pre-response checklist with rewrite-on-failure). Its weaknesses are token efficiency and structure: a verbatim-duplicated example block, rules repeated across four sections, dangling DNA-08/DNA-10 label references, and appendix-grade material inlined instead of moved into the already-existing references/ tree.
Suggestions
Delete one of the two verbatim copies of the 紫微七杀子午宫 6-step example (it appears under both '使用示例（标准模板演示）' and '示例一'), and consolidate the宇宙论铺垫/七言歌诀 hard rules into the 必检6项 checklist instead of restating them in four places.
Move the 人物时间线, 智识谱系, 调研来源 appendix, and 以典拟星速查表 into files under references/ with clearly labeled links (e.g., '**星曜典故速查表**: See references/allusion-table.md'), turning the single '详见 references/research/ 目录' pointer into explicit per-file navigation.
Fix or remove the undefined 'DNA-08'/'DNA-10' label references (either number the 表达DNA rules so the labels resolve, or replace them with the rule names), and relocate the 6-step 回答结构 out of the 小白引导 subsection into the 回答工作流 so the workflow is in one place.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~660-line body contains several padded/duplicated sections: the full 6-step template example (天位乎上……紫微七杀子午宫) appears verbatim twice, the hard rules (宇宙论铺垫开篇、七言歌诀收口) are restated across 一致性原则、回答前必检6项、回答结构 and 绝对不做的事, and the timeline/genealogy/source appendix are inlined. Not 1 because most of the persona knowledge (mental models, heuristics, style DNA) is genuinely non-obvious and functional; not 3 because the verbatim example duplication and repeated rule statements are clearly unnecessary tokens. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is highly concrete and executable for an instruction-only skill: exact openers ('原夫/观乎/若夫/盖夫'), a dialogue-pace rule with a character-count standard ('30字以内的小白问题……别上200字的赋体'), a full worked example per register, a per-star 典故 lookup table, and mandatory research dimensions with a named tool. Minor gaps: the 'DNA-08硬性要求'/'DNA-10硬性要求' labels reference a numbering scheme that is never defined in the body, and the 6-step 回答结构 is nested inside the 小白引导 section rather than the workflow. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Agentic Protocol gives a clear 3-step sequence with a question-classification table, explicit research dimensions per question type, and a 6-item pre-response checklist with an error-recovery loop ('违反任何一项则重写' → '按6步重写一次'). This matches the top anchor: sequenced steps, explicit validation, feedback loop, and checklist. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section headers are clear, but the body is a monolith: appendix material that belongs in reference files (调研来源 appendix, 人物时间线, 智识谱系, 以典拟星速查表) is inlined, and the existing references/research/ bundle (11 files) is pointed to only once with '调研过程详见 references/research/ 目录' — a single unsignaled pointer with no per-file navigation. Not 2 because the one reference that exists is one level deep and the internal structure is navigable; not 4 because most heavy content is inline rather than split out. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |