Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable and workflow-driven with strong validation feedback loops, but token-inefficient due to verbatim duplication and repeated checklists, and it functions as a monolithic reference rather than an overview pointing to detail files.
Suggestions
Remove the verbatim-duplicated 解盘 example (it appears both under «使用示例（标准模板演示）» ~line 472 and under «示例一：完整解盘档» ~line 555); keep only one instance.
Consolidate the overlapping 6-step guidance currently spread across 表达DNA一致性原则, 回答前必检6项, and 使用示例回答结构 into a single authoritative checklist to eliminate repeated rules.
Move the 以典拟星速查表, the research source bibliography (附录：调研来源), and the 人物时间线 into files under references/ and link to them from SKILL.md so the main file reads as an overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The domain content is substantive and mostly earns its place, but the 660-line body duplicates the full 解盘 example verbatim (once near line 472 and again near line 555) and repeats the 6-step checklist across 表达DNA, 回答前必检6项, and 使用示例 sections. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: each mental model carries 应用/局限, heuristics have 触发关键词/行动/反例信号/冲突解决 tables, plus a 6-step template, a 6-item pre-answer checklist, the 以典拟星速查表 lookup table, and 5 worked examples with exact output. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 3-step Agentic Protocol (问题分类 → 研究 → 回答) with an explicit 6-item validation checklist («回答前必检6项») and a feedback loop («自查不通过的标准动作…回到Step 3开头…重写») for error recovery. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | references/research/ is correctly signaled and one level deep (11 real files), but SKILL.md itself is a 660-line monolith that inlines the 以典拟星速查表, the source bibliography, the person timeline, and all 5 examples rather than splitting them into referenced files. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |