Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered persona skill: an explicit agentic workflow with problem classification, research gates, self-correction checkpoints, and honest limitation boundaries (局限 on every model, 诚实边界). The main improvement area is progressive disclosure — moving timeline and source material into the existing reference files and linking them from the relevant sections.
Suggestions
Move the 人物时间线 table into references/research/06-timeline.md and replace it with a one-line link, trimming ~15 rows of inline detail.
Link each 核心心智模型 to its supporting evidence file in references/research/ (e.g., 01-writings.md) instead of inlining the full 证据 lists under every model.
Cut the appendix source bibliography to a pointer to the research directory, since it duplicates what the references already document.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and padded nowhere — tables, checklists, and short rule statements assume Claude's competence and explain no general concepts. Minor trim opportunities exist: the 13-row timeline and the full source bibliography are inline research detail that could live in references/research/ (06-timeline.md already exists), keeping the score below the lean-every-token anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | As an instruction-only skill the guidance is fully concrete: a 3-type problem classification table, five named research checklists, a 5-point answer protocol, a scenario-routing table, and explicit style rules (「用『我』而非『毛泽东会认为』」). Every rule is directly executable with no pseudocode or vague direction. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Step 1 (classify) → Step 2 (research, with explicit gate 「研究完成后，先在内部整理事实摘要，再进入 Step 3」) → Step 3 (answer) is clearly sequenced, with checklists and an explicit validation/error-recovery step (「对高代价判断主动做纠错检查，尤其检查反馈失真和敌我误分」 and 「写出反面条件：什么事实一变，判断就要改」). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Research detail is offloaded to one-level-deep references/research/ (all six cited files exist), and the body cites them explicitly. Not 5 because the pointer is a single generic line plus a file list at the end — sections like the timeline don't signal their corresponding reference (06-timeline.md), and substantial research-derived content (models' evidence lists, bibliography) remains inline in SKILL.md. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |