Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered orchestration skill: the multi-agent workflow is unambiguous, validated at every stage, and backed by real one-level-deep reference files with exact file-naming conventions. The main cost is redundancy — core rules recur across 核心原则, 阶段 5a/5b, and the checklists, and the Anti-AI-tic guide is inlined rather than disclosed — which pushes conciseness down.
Suggestions
Deduplicate the rules stated three times (核心原则, 阶段 5a/5b, 自我验证清单): state each rule once at point of use and let the final checklist reference them by short name instead of restating them.
Move the ~40-line Anti-AI-tic 黑名单/替换原则 appendix and the 阶段 5b sentence-pattern table into a references/style-guide.md, keeping only the top 3 blacklist items inline as a pointer.
Replace the labeled 伪代码 dispatch example with a concrete single Agent-call invocation template (one full prompt built from references/expert-prompt-template.md) so the scheduling section is executable rather than illustrative.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The 309-line body contains no filler explaining concepts Claude already knows, but it repeats the same rules three times: the 核心原则 state "验证器不污染综合"/"专家意见用'站在xxx角度'措辞", 阶段 5a/5b restate them with new examples, and the 自我验证清单 restates them again — plus the "我朋友会这么说话吗" test appears twice (阶段 5 附录 and the final checklist). Substantial tightening by deduplication is possible without losing clarity, matching the 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance throughout: exact output paths and naming conventions ("markdown/{question-slug}/expert-{N}-{领域}.md", "{question-slug}/expert-{N}-{领域}-fig-{K}.svg"), ✅/❌ example sentences for phrasing, a four-row sentence-pattern table, and per-stage prompt files in references/. Falls short of 5 only because the dispatch example is explicitly labeled pseudocode ("调度示例（伪代码）") rather than an executable Agent-call template. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-stage workflow is explicitly sequenced (领域识别 → 并行产稿 → 事实核查 → 红队 → 综合 5a/5b) with validation checkpoints at each level: experts must self-review ("自我验证一轮...如不过关继续改"), verifiers have explicit 克制边界, 阶段 5b has an embedded-content self-check, and a final 12-item 自我验证清单 closes the loop with feedback for fixing failures. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Five reference files (expert-roster, expert-prompt-template, fact-checker-prompt, red-team-prompt, diagram-guide) all exist, are one level deep (no nested references), and are linked inline at point of use plus in a final 关键参考文件 section. Not a 5 because the body still inlines ~80 lines of Anti-AI-tic style-guide and sentence-pattern material that is self-contained guidance and could live in a reference file, keeping SKILL.md a leaner overview. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |