Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured orchestration skill: a clear sequenced workflow, fully actionable paths and dispatch patterns, and exemplary one-level-deep progressive disclosure with real reference files. The one weakness is conciseness — the design-rationale prose is discursive and could be condensed.
Suggestions
Condense the '这个 skill 在做什么，为什么这么设计' section into 2-3 terse bullets capturing only the behavior-relevant calibration guidance (restraint principle, default '日常深度' rigor), trimming the discursive rationale about why multi-expert and verification are needed.
Move the design-rationale framing into the relevant reference files (e.g., the restraint principle already lives in verifiers.md) and keep the body focused on the workflow and principles, reducing redundant explanation between body and references.
Tighten the conversational connective prose throughout ('所以这里的思路是…', '有一点要特别克制…') to a more direct imperative style to reclaim tokens without losing the calibration intent.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and free of known-concept padding (no 'what is first principles' filler), but the '为什么这么设计' section is a discursive ~3-paragraph rationale ('很多棘手问题之所以棘手…', '但多专家有个老毛病…', '有一点要特别克制…') that could be tightened into a few bullets; the conversational tone adds tokens beyond the minimum. Not a 2 because it is not severely padded; not a 4 because the over-explanation is more than minor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | For an orchestration/instruction skill the guidance is fully actionable: exact run directory ('markdown/multi-expert/<主题slug>-<YYYYMMDD>/' with 'experts/', 'assets/', 'review/'), exact output paths ('experts/NN-<角色>.md', 'review/fact-check.md', 'review/red-team.md', 'final.md'), explicit parallel-dispatch instructions ('在同一条消息里并行发起所有专家'), and verbatim briefs delegated to the reference files. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 8-step numbered sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (fact-check and red-team both run before synthesis in step 7), feedback loops (expert '交稿前自我验证一轮（不通过就改到通过）' retry), and a '关键原则速记' checklist; the destructive/batch cap does not apply since the skill only writes markdown and its batch-of-experts step is itself validated. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview body with well-signaled one-level-deep references — inline pointers ('任务书见 references/expert-brief.md', '见 references/verifiers.md', '见 references/synthesis.md') plus a dedicated '参考文件' section — and all three referenced files exist and are substantive; content is appropriately split between orchestration (body) and verbatim briefs (references). | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |