Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured instruction skill: the four-phase workflow is unambiguous, every phase has concrete file outputs, and both expert and final-draft self-check loops are explicit. The main cost is repetition — the SVG storage rule and the 'restraint' principle are each stated three times, inflating length without adding information.
Suggestions
State the SVG storage rule once (in 目录约定) and reference it from 阶段二 and 阶段四 with a single phrase like 'SVG 规则见目录约定' instead of repeating the full rule three times.
Consolidate the '克制' principle: state it once at the top of 阶段三 and drop the re-statements in the fact-check, red-team, and reflection subsections, which each re-derive the same idea.
Trim the parenthetical justifications inside the numbered expert-draft requirements (e.g., the multi-sentence rationale after requirement 7) — the requirement statement plus one short reason is enough.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient instruction-giving with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but it repeats itself: the SVG-storage rule appears three times (directory conventions, expert-draft requirement 3, and the final-draft bullet) and the '克制' principle is restated across phases. The repetition goes beyond the 'minor instances' of anchor 4, but there is no padding to the level of anchor 2. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance throughout: exact file conventions (markdown/00-question-brief.md, expert-<领域简称>-draft.md, review-fact-check.md, final-<主题slug>.md), a directory tree, an example persona ('有 15 年经验的半导体产业分析师'), 8 numbered per-draft requirements, and sample reflective sentences. A few directives remain judgment-based ('真正理解之后'), keeping it just below fully copy-paste-ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four phases are clearly sequenced with mandatory per-phase disk outputs, an expert self-verification loop (阶段二 requirement 8), and a final self-check checklist with fix-and-recheck ('发现不满足的地方就地微调'). This matches the anchor-5 pattern of explicit validation steps, feedback loops, and a checklist; no destructive/batch cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the single ~95-line body is well organized with clean section headers, so nothing requires external references. It sits just above the 'simple skill under 50 lines' case — the repeated SVG/克制 guidance is what keeps it from a perfect structure score rather than any missing or buried references. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |