Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable multi-stage workflow with strong validation and feedback loops, weakened mainly by verbosity from repeated emphasis and illustrative lists that could be tightened.
Suggestions
State the '克制' (restraint) principle once in stage 3 and reference it from later stages instead of restating it multiple times, to reduce repeated emphasis.
Trim the four-item example reflection-phrase list to one or two examples — the surrounding instruction ('自然地补一句反思') already conveys the intent.
Cut meta-commentary that restates a requirement's purpose (e.g., '这一条是为了让结论保持可检验'), since the requirement text itself communicates the intent.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with no basic-concept padding, but includes unnecessary explanation that could be tightened — repeated restatements of the '克制' principle across stages, a four-item example reflection-phrase list, and meta-commentary such as '这一条是为了让结论保持可检验'; this exceeds the 'minor instances' threshold of the 4 anchor, fitting 3. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, specific guidance for an instruction-only skill — exact file paths ('markdown/expert-<领域简称>-draft.md', 'markdown/assets/'), an 8-point expert-draft checklist, and explicit rewrite rules; falls short of 5 only because no complete worked example of a finished output is given to cover the common cases. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Four clearly sequenced phases (分诊 → 专家并行作答 → 审阅 → 重写终稿) with explicit validation steps (自我验证 in stage 2, 终稿完成后的自检 checklist in stage 4) and feedback loops ('就地修改后再检查一遍，直到自己挑不出明显毛病为止'), matching the 5 anchor; not a destructive/batch skill so the cap-3 rule does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with a clear overview summary plus per-phase section headers and no nested references; scores 4 rather than 5 because the skill is self-contained with no one-level-deep references or content split into files, and a few sections (e.g., the example reflection-phrase list) are inline where trimming would tighten organization. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |