Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured single-file workflow skill with an exemplary six-step sequence, explicit self-verification loops, an output checklist, and concrete file-handling conventions. Its weaknesses are repetition of the same requirements across steps (falsifiability, svg handling, restraint) and inlining of reference-grade style specifications that inflate the token budget.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated requirements: state the 证伪/证明, svg-separate-file, and 克制/restraint rules once (e.g., in a short shared '产出规范' section) and reference them from steps 2, 4, and 5 instead of restating them each time — this would cut roughly 20-30% of the body.
Split the expert-draft requirements (step 2's eight items) and the final-writer style guide (step 4's bullet list) into references files (e.g., references/expert-draft-spec.md and references/final-style-guide.md), keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview with clearly signaled links.
Trim meta-commentary ('这一条是重灾区…务必认真写', '不是走流程'-style justifications) and replace with terse imperative instructions, keeping only the constraints themselves.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is well-organized and mostly efficient, but noticeably repetitive: the 证伪/证明 requirement is stated in steps 2, 4, and 6; the svg-separate-file rule appears in both step 2 and step 4; the "克制" restraint principle is explained in both step 3 and step 5; and meta-commentary like "这一条是重灾区…务必认真写" pads the instruction. It is not 4 because the duplication is recurring rather than a couple of trimmable spots, and not 2 because there is no explaining of concepts Claude already knows — everything is skill-specific process guidance. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill the guidance is concrete and executable: exact file naming conventions ("markdown/expert-<领域简称>.md", "fact-check.md", "red-team.md", "final-<主题slug>.md"), asset paths ("markdown/assets/<领域简称>-<图名>.svg"), environment adaptation logic for with/without subagents, and example insertion phrases for step 5. Not 5 because there are no copy-ready example prompts or draft skeletons for dispatching the subagents, which would make the dispatch step fully turnkey; not 3 because the guidance is specific and directly executable, not high-level hints. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced six-step workflow with an ASCII pipeline overview, an explicit expert self-verification loop ("自我验证一轮再定稿…直到确认无误再定稿"), a convergence review stage (fact-check + red-team), a step-6 itemized recheck against every requirement, and an output checklist of expected files. This matches the anchor for clear sequence with explicit validation steps, feedback loops, and a checklist; not 4 because validation checkpoints are present and explicit at every stage, not mostly present. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist; the skill is a single ~120-line file with well-organized sections, a flow diagram, and an output checklist, and no buried or nested references. Structure is good and most content is appropriately placed for a single-file skill. Not 5 because the file exceeds the simple-skill threshold (~50 lines) and bodies of reference-grade content — the expert draft specifications and the final-writer style guide — are inlined where they could be split into references files; not 3 because there are no dangling or poorly-signaled references and nothing is deeply nested. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |