Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable workflow with clear sequencing, self-verification loops, and concrete file-naming conventions. Its main weakness is conciseness: requirement lists are duplicated across the expert and final-draft steps, and several rationale paragraphs restate motivation Claude can infer.
Suggestions
Consolidate the duplicated requirements: 证伪/证明, 第一性原理/前置条件, and 适用边界 appear in both Step 2 and Step 4 — reference a single shared list instead of restating it.
Trim the motivational rationale ('核心理念…' and the sub-agent/context-pollution explanation) down to the procedural instructions; Claude can infer the why.
Add at least one worked example (a sample question → abbreviated expert draft → final article excerpt) so the qualitative final-draft criteria ('有人味', '标题要一针见血') have a concrete anchor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly procedural and assumes Claude's competence (no basic-concept padding), but it restates the same requirements — 证伪/证明, 第一性原理/前置条件, 适用边界 — in both Step 2 and Step 4, and includes motivational rationale paragraphs ('核心理念…', the sub-agent/context-pollution explanation) that could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout: exact file paths (markdown/expert-<领域简称>.md, markdown/fact-check.md, markdown/red-team.md, markdown/final-<主题slug>.md, assets/*.svg), an 8-point expert checklist, and a specific final-draft requirement list; the gap is the absence of any worked input/output example. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 6-step process with explicit checkpoints (Step 2 point 8 self-verify with a fix→re-check loop, Step 6 final self-check against the Step 4 list) and checklists; the minor gap is that validation is subjective self-inspection rather than objective pass/fail criteria. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed for this self-contained workflow; the body is well-organized with clear section headers (何时使用, 整体流程, 第一步…第六步, 输出清单) and a flow diagram, though the ~120-line monolith could optionally offload the detailed checklists to a reference. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |