Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strong operating manual: exceptionally actionable (exact tool names, query strings, naming templates, fixed output structure), a workflow with genuine STOP checkpoints and a rewrite-on-failure feedback loop, and clean progressive disclosure backed by a real, verified bundle. The one real weakness is conciseness — enforcement rules (search tool, SVG handling, fact sourcing) are restated 3–4 times across Workflow, Quality Standards, Resources, Fallback Rules, and the anti-pattern blacklist, which inflates the body without adding information.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated enforcement rules: state the mcp__MiniMax__web_search-only rule, the external-SVG/≥2-figures rule, and the ≥3-sourced-facts rule once (e.g., in Quality Standards) and remove their re-statements in Step 1, Step 5, Resources, and the 反例黑名单 table.
Cut the 反例黑名单 table's rows that merely restate Quality Standards prohibitions ("用内联 <svg>", "推荐具体个股") and keep only the rows that add new reasoning (e.g., 区分关键节点 vs 完整产业链, 退坡期标注).
Merge the Core Philosophy 势—道—术 table with the Step 3 summary, since the full framework already lives in references/trend-analysis-framework.md — one compact pointer would save ~20 lines.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and never explains concepts Claude already knows, but the same rules are restated three to four times across sections: the mcp__MiniMax__web_search-only rule appears in Step 1, Quality Standards, Resources, and Fallback Rules (×4); the external-SVG / ≥2-figures rule appears in Step 5, Step 6, Quality Standards, and the 反例黑名单 (×4); the ≥3-sourced-facts rule appears in Step 2, Step 6, and Quality Standards (×3). Not 4: the repetition goes beyond 'minor instances that could be trimmed' — consolidating enforcement rules into one section would cut the body meaningfully. Not 2: there is no padded concept explanation or fluff; every section carries operational content. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill the guidance is copy-paste ready: the exact MCP tool name (mcp__MiniMax__web_search) with concrete query strings ("十五五规划 全文"), file-naming templates with a worked example (markdown/state-trend-investment-20260611.md), SVG paths with reference syntax, a fixed 7-section output format, per-scenario content requirements, and a yes/no self-check list. Not 4: the common cases (search, deduce, render, write) each have specific executable instructions with no missing key details. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 0–7 are explicitly sequenced with a mandatory 🛑 Checkpoint 0 ("未拿到完整 5 项输入前，禁止进入 Step 1") and a Step 6 quality checklist with a rewrite feedback loop ("命中任一即重写"), plus a Fallback Rules table pairing each failure symptom with a first-line fix and a fallback. Not 4: this matches the anchor's 'explicit validation steps; feedback loops for error recovery; checklists' — validation is not merely implied. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an operating overview and every detail module is split into a real, one-level-deep reference: all 6 references/*.md and 4 assets/svg/*.svg cited in the body exist on disk, each is referenced inline at its point of use (Step 2/3/4/6) and catalogued again in a Resources section with one-line descriptions. Spot-checks confirm the body summarizes rather than duplicates (e.g., the 势—道—术 table in the body is a compact map; the 5-step detail lives in trend-analysis-framework.md). Not 4: references are well-signaled, shallow, and content is appropriately split with no orphaned or buried paths. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |