Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable instruction set for generating policy-trend strategic reports, with concrete search queries, output templates, SVG specs, and a validation checklist. It could be tightened slightly (removing the philosophy quote) and would benefit from a more precise scoring rule for the endowment-trend matrix and a clearer error-recovery loop.
Suggestions
Remove the '风来了，猪都能飞' 核心理念 quote block; the execution flow already conveys the skill's intent without it.
Tighten the 禀赋-趋势匹配矩阵 scoring into a concrete rule or formula (e.g., explicit weights for 切入难度/竞争烈度/个人匹配度) rather than leaving it as '1-5分，综合考虑'.
Add an explicit feedback loop in Step 2 for when search results conflict or are sparse (e.g., 're-run with refined query terms' before falling back to defaults), to lift workflow clarity to 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly operational and tight — concrete search terms, report templates, SVG specs, and a checklist — with only minor padding such as the '风来了，猪都能飞' 核心理念 philosophy quote that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, mostly executable guidance: copy-paste web_search queries, exact SVG viewBox/colors/fonts, a `mkdir -p markdown/` command, and a precise naming convention; minor gaps remain in the qualitative 禀赋-趋势 matrix scoring, which is described but not as a precise algorithm. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 8-step sequence with an overview, plus validation checkpoints ('每类至少搜索 2 次以交叉验证', 数据校验原则, and a final 质量自检清单); however there is no explicit error-recovery feedback loop, keeping it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure with one well-signaled one-level reference (`references/persona_mapping.md`); the main file is well-sectioned but fairly long, and the single reference link is a brief one-line mention rather than prominently contextualized. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |