Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, highly actionable eight-step workflow with concrete search queries, output templates, SVG specifications, and a final quality checklist. It is efficient and largely executable, held back only by minor fluff, the absence of a worked example for the matrix/SVG steps, and no failure-recovery guidance for searches.
Suggestions
Trim the motivational epigraph and soft style directives (e.g. "风来了，猪都能飞", "有温度") to reclaim tokens without losing operational value.
Add a brief worked example for the禀赋-趋势匹配矩阵 (one persona scored against one风口) and a minimal SVG snippet showing the required viewBox/color/typography conventions, so the chart steps are copy-paste ready.
Add one line of recovery guidance in Step 2 for when searches return nothing or a source is unavailable (e.g. broaden the query, fall back to the persona mapping reference), and move the persona_mapping reference pointer into Step 4 where it is used.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and operational (literal search queries, report templates, SVG specs, naming conventions) with almost no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, but the motivational epigraph ("风来了，猪都能飞。"), soft style directives ("有温度", "不模糊"), and a checklist that partially restates earlier steps could be trimmed. Efficient with minor over-explanation — anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste ready search query strings, an explicit report structure template, concrete SVG design specs (viewBox, colors, font sizes), file naming rules with examples, and one worked citation example ("📌 历史参照：2012年 4G牌照发放 → ..."). Falls short of anchor 5 because the matching-matrix scoring (Step 4) and SVG chart contents are described as frameworks/placeholders rather than a worked example, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 8-step sequence with explicit verification checkpoints: cross-validation ("每类至少搜索 2 次以交叉验证"), source-authority rules, contradiction resolution ("优先采信最新、最权威来源"), web_fetch verification, and an 8-item final self-check checklist. Sits below anchor 5 because there is no recovery guidance when a search returns nothing or a required source is unavailable — a minor validation gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single bundle file references/persona_mapping.md exists, is one level deep, and is clearly signaled from a dedicated section ("参见 references/persona_mapping.md"), while the core workflow stays appropriately inline in a well-sectioned body. Minor organization gap: the reference is pointed to only after Step 8 rather than from Step 4 (the mapping step where it is actually used), fitting anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |