Optional skill. Reconstruct a human-review-preparation file from an existing pull request, merge request, branch diff, or commit range in a repository the user trusts. Use when the user wants retrospective understanding of already-implemented changes, AI-side assessment and recommendations, and an optional provider-specific sharing variant written to a local file when needed.
63
75%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./skills/spec-loop-assess-pull-request/SKILL.mdUse this skill only for pull requests, merge requests, branch diffs, or commit ranges from repositories the user trusts. This skill is optional and is not required for the core Spec Loop planning workflow. If trust is unclear, stop and ask before fetching provider or Git content.
Follow review-guidance.md for trust handling, evidence collection, review structure, diagram rules, and sharing-variant behavior.
Before work:
PLAN -> EXECUTION approval
gate to the reviewed change itself; andReconstruct already-implemented work as the retrospective Spec Loop
review artifact that should have existed, then add AI assessment and
recommendations. Do not treat the change as waiting at the normal
PLAN -> EXECUTION gate.
Use read-only provider commands for evidence when available:
gh for GitHubglab for GitLab, including self-hosted GitLab when availableWhen trust, provider, evidence source, or comparison range is unclear, stop and ask.
741f932
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.