CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

spec-loop-assess-pull-request

Optional skill. Reconstruct a human-review-preparation file from an existing pull request, merge request, branch diff, or commit range in a repository the user trusts. Use when the user wants retrospective understanding of already-implemented changes, AI-side assessment and recommendations, and an optional provider-specific sharing variant written to a local file when needed.

63

Quality

75%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/spec-loop-assess-pull-request/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Use this skill only for pull requests, merge requests, branch diffs, or commit ranges from repositories the user trusts. This skill is optional and is not required for the core Spec Loop planning workflow. If trust is unclear, stop and ask before fetching provider or Git content.

Follow review-guidance.md for trust handling, evidence collection, review structure, diagram rules, and sharing-variant behavior.

Before work:

Reconstruct already-implemented work as the retrospective Spec Loop review artifact that should have existed, then add AI assessment and recommendations. Do not treat the change as waiting at the normal PLAN -> EXECUTION gate.

Use read-only provider commands for evidence when available:

  • gh for GitHub
  • glab for GitLab, including self-hosted GitLab when available

When trust, provider, evidence source, or comparison range is unclear, stop and ask.

Repository
dpolivaev/spec-loop
Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.