spec-loop-assess-pull-request
Optional skill. Reconstruct a human-review-preparation file from an existing pull request, merge request, branch diff, or commit range in a repository the user trusts. Use when the user wants retrospective understanding of already-implemented changes, AI-side assessment and recommendations, and an optional provider-specific sharing variant written to a local file when needed.
63
75%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./skills/spec-loop-assess-pull-request/SKILL.mdLow
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
W011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).
What this means
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
Why it was flagged
In provider-backed mode, the required workflow fetches outsider-authored PR/MR metadata and discussion text (e.g., PR body/comments and commit messages) via `gh pr view <pr> --json ...` / `--comments` and `gh api .../comments`, which are then ingested into the agent’s LLM context as untrusted free text.
- Repository
- dpolivaev/spec-loop
- Commit
741f932
- Audited
- Security analysis
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.