Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly executable, concise, and workflow-driven with explicit validation via logs and a completion checklist. Progressive disclosure is the lone soft spot because the skill is a single inlined file with no supporting bundle, and one inline reference points outside any bundle.
Suggestions
If detailed HUD/placement guidance is load-bearing, move it into a `references/hud.md` bundle file and link to it so the body stays an overview with one-level-deep references.
Otherwise, drop the dangling `docs/concepts/spatial-ui/hud.md` pointer or confirm it resolves, since it currently points outside any provided bundle.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence; the only conceptual aside ("HTML/CSS-shaped, but it is not a browser engine") is a justified domain-specific caveat rather than padding, and every line earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Every section provides copy-paste-ready commands with exact flags and JSON arguments (e.g., `ui render-preview --input-json '{...}'`), plus complete TypeScript samples for both code-owned and scene-authored instances. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence with per-edit rerender substeps, explicit log-inspection guidance instead of fixed waits, and a final completion checklist that acts as validation checkpoints for this destructive/asset-mutating workflow. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and clearly signaled, but no bundle files (references/scripts/assets) exist, and the inline pointer to `docs/concepts/spatial-ui/hud.md` references a non-bundled external path, leaving minor organization gaps relative to the 5-anchor one-level-deep reference structure. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |