Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and well-sequenced with strong validation and recovery loops, making it an effective executable workflow. The only meaningful gaps are minor redundancy and a large single-file footprint that could be split.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean—commands with brief 'Assert:' lines—and assumes Claude's competence (no XR/grab concept explanations), but the trigger-vs-squeeze distinction is restated three times (Component Reference, Critical Distinction note, and Known Issues), which could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every step is a copy-paste-ready 'npx iwsdk' command with concrete JSON payloads, and the examples cover all five suites including the common cases, matching the fully-executable anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–5 are explicitly sequenced with per-command 'Assert:' validation checkpoints, plus a Recovery section with restart-and-retry feedback loops and a final summary checklist, matching the clear-sequence-with-explicit-validation anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is self-contained with no nested references and is organized into clear sections (suites, Component Reference, Known Issues), but at ~430 lines with no external split it is above the simple-skill threshold, so it sits just below the well-signaled-reference anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |