Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, fully executable test procedure with strong validation checkpoints and recovery guidance. Its only weak spot is progressive disclosure — everything is inline with no reference files for background material.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — concrete commands and assertions with no concept over-explanation — but repeats the dev-server start command in Recovery and could be trimmed slightly, fitting 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every test provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands such as 'npx iwsdk ecs find --input-json {"withComponents":["ScreenSpace"]}' with explicit JSON payloads and precise assertions, matching 'fully executable; copy-paste ready'. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-5 are clearly sequenced with explicit 'Assert' validation checkpoints, a Recovery feedback loop (stop → restart → re-run → retry once), and a results summary table, matching 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps; feedback loops for error recovery'. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist so all content is inline, but it is well-sectioned into Steps, Suites, Recovery, and Known Issues; the only gap is that the reference-like Known Issues section could live in a separate file, fitting 'good structure; minor organization gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |