CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

test-ui

Test UIKitML asset and ScreenSpace UI behavior against the poke example using the iwsdk CLI.

61

Quality

73%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/test-ui/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a strong executable test harness: fully concrete commands, explicit assertions, clear sequencing with validation checkpoints and a bounded recovery loop. The only weaknesses are minor over-explanation that could be trimmed and inline background material that could be moved to a reference file.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dominated by exact commands and assertions with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, but contains minor trimmable over-explanation such as "You do not need to extract or manage the port yourself; subsequent commands resolve the active runtime through the CLI automatically" and repeated full `npx @iwsdk/cli ecs systems` invocations across suites.

4 / 5

Actionability

Every step is a fully executable, copy-paste-ready `npx @iwsdk/cli` command with exact `--input-json` payloads, timeouts, expected cwd, and explicit pass/fail assertions, covering all common cases including the one substitution placeholder `<panel>` which is explicitly defined.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The sequence (install → dev server → connectivity → pre-test setup → five suites → cleanup) is explicit with validation assertions at every step, defined failure branches ("If the server fails to start within 60 seconds, report FAIL for all suites and skip to Step 5"), and a Recovery section with a bounded retry-once feedback loop.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A single well-sectioned SKILL.md with clear headers, no nested or dangling references, and no bundle files required; however, at ~250 lines the "Known Issues & Workarounds" material is inlined rather than split into a reference file, so structure is good with minor organization gaps rather than exemplary.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and highly distinctive, with no risk of collision with other skills, but it omits any 'when to use' trigger guidance and only gestures at a single action. Adding an explicit trigger clause and naming the concrete outputs (five test suites with a PASS/FAIL report) would raise it substantially.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. "Use when asked to verify UI panel loading, ScreenSpace, or system/component registration in the poke example, or to run UI regression checks."

Enumerate the concrete actions covered (e.g. panel loading, ScreenSpace values, system and component registration, stability checks) instead of the single generic verb 'Test'.

Include natural trigger phrases and synonyms users would say, such as "run the poke tests", "verify the UI", or "UI regression", to improve trigger term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names a concrete domain and tool ("Test UIKitML asset and ScreenSpace UI behavior against the poke example using the iwsdk CLI") but lists only a single action verb ('Test'), matching the anchor for naming the domain with 1-2 concrete actions without comprehensive coverage rather than listing several specific actions.

3 / 5

Completeness

It clearly answers 'what' ("Test UIKitML asset and ScreenSpace UI behavior against the poke example using the iwsdk CLI") but has no "Use when..." clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, so completeness is capped at 3 per the judging guidelines.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Terms like "Test", "UI", "ScreenSpace", "poke example", and "iwsdk CLI" are relevant to the domain, but common variations users might naturally say (e.g. "run tests", "verify panel", "check the example", "regression") are missing, which matches the 'some relevant keywords but missing variations' anchor.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Highly niche terms ("UIKitML", "ScreenSpace UI", "poke example", "iwsdk CLI") give it a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal risk of firing for the wrong skill.

5 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
facebook/immersive-web-sdk
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.