Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable test procedure that gives concrete MCP tool calls and verification checks at each step. The main gap is the absence of an explicit error-recovery loop when a verification step fails.
Suggestions
Add a brief error-recovery note (e.g. 'If a verification check fails, re-run xr_get_session_status and report the discrepancy before proceeding') to close the feedback loop and raise workflow clarity.
Clarify expected values for the optional device-state checks (e.g. what 'valid' headset position looks like) so step 4 is as unambiguous as the other verifications.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient: each step is a brief tool call plus targeted checks, with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable: every step names a specific MCP tool (e.g. 'mcp__iwsdk-dev-mcp__xr_accept_session') with concrete pass/fail checks like 'visibilityState is "visible"'. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 7-step sequence with explicit verification checkpoints at steps 3, 6, and 7, but it lacks an explicit error-recovery feedback loop (what to do when a check fails). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single-purpose skill with well-organized sections (Test Flow, Arguments, Expected Results) and no need for external references, so the in-skill structure fully suffices. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |