Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, actionable, and well-structured for a thin routing skill, with executable commands and a single clearly-signaled external reference. The main gap is the absence of an explicit validation checkpoint in the execution-order workflow.
Suggestions
Add a brief verification step in the execution order, e.g. confirm 'deepline auth status' shows connected before invoking deepline-gtm.
Make the routing gate outcome explicit (e.g. 'if the gate does not route to clay-to-deepline, stop and ask') so the delegation has a clear checkpoint.
Consider noting what to do if the recipe file at ../deepline-gtm/recipes/clay-to-deepline.md is missing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — a compact Quick Start with executable commands and a short numbered execution order — with no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready shell commands (npm install, deepline auth register/wait/status) and concrete routing steps with an explicit recipe file path. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The three execution steps are clearly sequenced, but the workflow is delegation to a meta-skill with no explicit validation/checkpoint for confirming routing or recipe load success. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized sections (Quick Start, Execution order) and a single clearly-signaled one-level-deep reference to the recipe file at a relative path. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |