CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

deepline-org-chart

Build an interactive account org chart, leadership map, buying committee, or manager/report neighborhood around a person. Use for decision makers, reporting-line candidates, stakeholder mapping, and warm intro paths. Skip standalone email lookup and unrelated cross-company prospecting.

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

An exemplary lean router skill: the body does exactly what a shortcut wrapper should — install, delegate to the governing meta-skill, and conditionally expose the recipe path — with crisp sequencing and no token waste. The residual weaknesses are missing failure-mode handling and a cross-bundle file dependency that leaves the skill a dead end if deepline-gtm is absent.

Suggestions

State what "deepline -h" verifies (e.g., successful install and available recipe flags) so the Quick Start block has an explicit success criterion rather than an unexplained command.

Add a fallback step for failure modes: what to do if invoking deepline-gtm fails or the routing gate does not route to account-orgchart (error message vs. proceeding with the general meta-skill flow).

Consolidate the three repetitions of "the meta-skill governs the session / handles everything else" (Quick Start, step 2, closing paragraph) into one authoritative statement to trim tokens further.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The ~24-line body is lean: a two-line install block and numbered directives with no concept explanations, no padding, and nothing Claude already knows. The repeated emphasis that "deepline-gtm governs the entire session" is deliberate reinforcement of the skill's single governing rule rather than fluff, so the 5 anchor fits; there is no unnecessary explanation that would drag it to 4.

5 / 5

Actionability

Concrete and executable: "npm install -g deepline", "deepline -h", "Invoke `deepline-gtm` using the Skill tool", and a specific relative path ("../deepline-gtm/recipes/account-orgchart.md") with an explicit access condition. It stops short of the 5 anchor because the purpose and success criteria of "deepline -h" are never stated, and there is no guidance for the case where the meta-skill or the referenced recipe path is unavailable; it clearly exceeds the 3 anchor (no pseudocode, no missing key details for the in-scope steps).

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The "Execution order" section gives a clearly sequenced 1-2-3 process with a conditional gate ("only when that gate routes you to it") as a checkpoint. It misses the 5 anchor because there is no validation or recovery step for failure modes (meta-skill not found, gate not routing as expected); the destructive/batch cap at 3 does not apply since this is a read/routing skill.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A clear router overview with well-organized sections and one clearly signaled, one-level-deep conditional reference to "../deepline-gtm/recipes/account-orgchart.md"; this skill's own bundle has no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories. It falls below the 5 anchor because the one reference points into a sibling skill's bundle rather than this skill's own files — a hard external dependency (the path does not resolve in this environment) with no fallback, which is a minor organization gap.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: concrete deliverables, explicit use-for triggers with synonyms, and an unusually helpful negative-trigger clause that reduces misfiring against neighboring lookup/prospecting skills. The only gaps are a single-verb action list and a few missing natural phrasings like "who reports to whom".

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Build an interactive account org chart, leadership map, buying committee, or manager/report neighborhood around a person" names the domain and several concrete deliverables. It sits below the 5 anchor because it rests on a single action verb ("build") with output variants rather than multiple distinct operations, and above the 3 anchor because coverage of outputs (org chart, leadership map, buying committee, manager/report neighborhood) goes well beyond 1-2 actions.

4 / 5

Completeness

Both questions are explicitly answered: "what" via "Build an interactive account org chart, leadership map, buying committee, or manager/report neighborhood around a person" and "when" via "Use for decision makers, reporting-line candidates, stakeholder mapping, and warm intro paths" with concrete trigger phrases. It also adds explicit skip guidance ("Skip standalone email lookup and unrelated cross-company prospecting"), matching the 5 anchor and exceeding the 4 anchor where the "when" is less specific.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms users would say are well covered: "org chart", "leadership map", "buying committee", "stakeholder mapping", "warm intro paths", "decision makers", "reporting-line candidates". It falls short of the 5 anchor because common phrasings like "who reports to whom", "org structure", or "account hierarchy" are absent; it clearly beats the 3 anchor, which requires missing common variations.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche (person-centered organizational mapping within an account) with distinct triggers, plus an explicit skip clause ("Skip standalone email lookup and unrelated cross-company prospecting") that actively disambiguates from adjacent skills. Anti-drift check against the 4 anchor confirms the skip guidance pushes this firmly to minimal conflict risk.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

getaero-io/gtm-eng-skills

Path

skills/deepline-org-chart/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.