CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

awesome-game-security-overview

Guide for understanding and contributing to the awesome-game-security curated resource list. Use this skill when adding new resources, organizing categories, mapping topics across anti-cheat, Windows kernel, DMA, reverse engineering, and game-engine research, or maintaining README.md format consistency.

68

Quality

82%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

65%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-structured and actionable with concrete commands and URL templates, but it carries redundant content between the README-coverage and category sections and lacks validation feedback loops for batch operations. No bundle files exist, so progressive disclosure rests on sectioning alone.

Suggestions

Collapse the redundant 'Main Categories' (27 sections) and 'README Coverage' lists into a single section to remove the overlap that hurts conciseness.

Add an explicit validate→fix→retry loop for the link-verification step in the Contributing Guidelines so batch maintenance has a validation checkpoint.

Move the verbose URL catalog and 27-category enumeration into a reference file (or the wiki) and link to it one level deep, keeping SKILL.md a lean overview.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient but padded with redundancy: the 'Main Categories' list of 27 sections overlaps the earlier 'README Coverage' list, and the closing 'Compiled wiki' section repeats wiki details already given in 'Data Source §0'. Could be tightened.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready executable commands (python scripts/generate-toc.py) and concrete URL templates with worked examples for description/archive/wiki lookups, matching the 'fully executable / copy-paste ready' anchor.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Sequences are present (numbered contributing steps, a 1→4 priority order for repo lookups) but batch operations like link verification mention no validate→fix→retry checkpoint, which caps clarity at 2 per the rubric.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well organized but it is a monolithic single file with no bundle files; content that could be split (full URL catalog, the 27-category enumeration) is inline, so it stops short of the clear one-level-deep reference structure.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, well-formed description that states concrete capabilities, includes an explicit 'Use this skill when...' trigger, and is scoped to a clear niche with natural trigger terms. No significant weaknesses.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names multiple concrete actions — 'adding new resources', 'organizing categories', 'mapping topics across...research', and 'maintaining README.md format consistency' — matching the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Guide for understanding and contributing...') and when via the 'Use this skill when...' clause, matching the top anchor.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Natural trigger phrases users would say (adding resources, README format, plus domain terms like anti-cheat, DMA, reverse engineering) with good coverage; not just technical jargon.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Scoped to a single curated repo with distinct triggers (README.md format, category organization for game-security), making it unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 4 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
gmh5225/awesome-game-security
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.