Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A thorough, well-structured triage workflow with concrete templates and validation checkpoints. Main weaknesses are length/conciseness and inlined orchestration detail that could be split into bundle files.
Suggestions
Move the inter-agent coordination protocol and output-format templates into a references/ bundle file (agent-orchestration.md is already referenced) and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview.
Collapse the duplicate 'Suggested next agent' and 'Suggested new agent' output-format blocks into a single parameterized template.
Add an explicit error-recovery loop (e.g. what to do when a move fails or a wikilink target is missing) to strengthen the workflow's feedback checkpoints.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly direct and actionable without explaining concepts Claude already knows, though the ~270-line body has sections (elaborate inter-agent coordination, two separate output-format blocks) that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | A concrete destinations table, specific frontmatter field changes, wikilink formats, and ready-to-fill MOC/digest/post-it templates give mostly executable guidance with only minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–6 are clearly sequenced with a Pre-Move Checklist (verify destination, check duplicates) and user-confirmation gates for archiving; validation is present so the batch-operation cap does not apply, though error-recovery loops are only lightly specified. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and the agent-orchestration/agents-registry references are one-level-deep and clearly signaled, but no bundle files exist and substantial orchestration/output-format detail is inlined that could live in the referenced files. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |