CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

company-funding-search

Find company funding history, investors, and investment details

52

Quality

58%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/lead-generation/capabilities/company-funding-search/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

50%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill provides actionable, well-structured API guidance but is held back by broken-looking primary curl templates (empty api/path), redundant when-to-use sections, and an implicit async-polling loop. Tightening these would lift both actionability and conciseness.

Suggestions

Replace the empty "api":"","path":"" placeholders in the primary commands with the real api/path values (currently only correct inside <details>), or consolidate each endpoint into one correct example.

Collapse the three overlapping "when to use" treatments ("When to Use", "When to Use Which", "Tips") into a single decision table to remove redundancy.

Add an explicit poll-until-ready step for Nyne (e.g., loop with a short sleep until the result is no longer pending, handling the pending state alongside 404/429).

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly executable curl guidance but carries redundancy — the "When to Use" list, "When to Use Which" table, and "Tips" overlap, and "Nyne is async" / "company_name > company_domain" are each stated multiple times.

2 / 3

Actionability

Concrete curl commands with auth and params are provided, but the primary examples ship with empty "api":"","path":"" placeholders; the fully executable endpoints only appear inside the collapsed <details>, so the main snippets are not copy-paste ready.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The Nyne async flow is sequenced (POST → request_id → poll), but there is no explicit poll-until-ready checkpoint or pending-state handling, leaving the feedback loop implicit.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The single file is well organized with headers, a decision table, and <details> for alternate curls, but it is monolithic with no external references and the inline redundancy could be consolidated.

2 / 3

Total

8

/

12

Passed

Description

67%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and occupies a clear niche, but it omits any explicit "Use when..." trigger guidance and lacks common funding-related keyword variations. Adding a trigger clause and broader natural terms would materially improve activation.

Suggestions

Append a "Use when..." clause, e.g. "Use when the user asks about funding rounds, who invested in a company, or wants to find companies by funding stage."

Broaden trigger terms to include natural phrasings like "raised", "funding rounds", "Series A/B", and "VCs/investors".

Optionally distinguish the two underlying APIs (specific-company lookup vs. funding-criteria search) to sharpen activation.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Find company funding history, investors, and investment details" names multiple concrete actions (funding history, investors, investment details), matching the multi-action anchor rather than a single vague domain mention.

3 / 3

Completeness

It states what the skill does but has no "Use when..." or equivalent trigger clause, so the "when" is only implied — capping completeness at 2 per the guidelines.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Terms like "funding history", "investors", and "investment details" are natural, but common variations users say ("funding rounds", "raised", "Series A/B", "VC", "who funded") are missing.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The company-funding niche is clearly scoped with distinct triggers and is unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.