Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-sequenced, largely actionable multi-phase workflow with concrete endpoints and useful taxonomies, weakened mainly by duplicated trigger sections, unspecified TikTok/LinkedIn endpoints, and a monolithic structure with a large inlined report template.
Suggestions
Consolidate the 'When to Use' and 'Trigger Phrases' sections into one list to remove near-duplicate content and tighten token use.
Specify concrete TikTok and LinkedIn ad-library endpoint paths (as done for Meta and Google) instead of deferring to 'the official provider reference', or point to a bundled reference file with the resolved operations.
Add an explicit coverage-verification checkpoint before Phase 5 (e.g., 'confirm each competitor returned ads; if zero, retry via web search or alternate name') to satisfy batch-operation validation, and consider moving the full Phase 8 report template into a references/ file linked from the body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient tactical guidance (endpoint YAML, field checklists, taxonomies), but the 'When to Use' list and the closing 'Trigger Phrases' list are near-duplicates, and the intro/Core-principle paragraph restates the description — minor instances that could be trimmed, so just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly concrete for Meta and Google (explicit endpoint paths, per-ad field lists, hook/CTA taxonomies), but TikTok and LinkedIn phases defer to 'resolve the current... operations from the official provider reference' rather than specifying endpoints — a minor gap keeping it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear Phases 0–8 sequence with several checkpoints (documented fallbacks, marking fallback records, coverage summary, message-match scoring), but verification gates are scattered rather than explicit 'validate then proceed' steps, leaving minor validation gaps for a batch operation. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized in-file structure (phases, tables, headers) but entirely monolithic — no bundle files exist and the large inlined Phase 8 report template (~150 lines) could live in a separate reference, matching the score-3 anchor of 'content that should be separate is inline'. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |