CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

create-chatgpt-mockup

Render pixel-accurate ChatGPT mobile (iOS) screen mockups in light mode from a thread JSON. Supports user text bubbles, user image attachments, assistant markdown prose, citation chips, the OpenAI spiral logo, the Apps-SDK GPT chip in the composer, and three header styles (model-tag, plain title, "Get Plus"). Fixed 9:16 viewport. Outputs HTML + PNG.

64

Quality

80%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/ads/packs/video-ad-formats/create-chatgpt-mockup/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with a clear, validated workflow, but suffers from duplicated Quality Checks / Failure Modes sections and a bundle-integrity problem where most referenced files are missing and the existing reference images are orphaned.

Suggestions

Merge the duplicate 'Quality checks'/'Quality Checks' and 'Failure modes'/'Failure Modes' sections into one of each to remove the redundancy.

Resolve the bundle mismatch: either include the referenced render.js/generate.js/templates/examples/ files in the bundle, or correct the '## Files' table and inline references to match what is actually shipped.

Reference references/*.png from the body (or remove them) so the existing bundle files are not orphaned.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The content is mostly concrete and useful, but it duplicates two whole sections — '## Quality checks' (checklist) vs '## Quality Checks' (prose) and '## Failure modes' vs '## Failure Modes' — covering the same material, which should be consolidated.

3 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable guidance: copy-paste CLI commands ('node render.js --thread examples/01-sunscreen-image.json'), a complete thread JSON schema, a field reference, flags table, setup steps, and exact values (#F4F4F4, 28px, 999px, 44×44, 2250×4872) covering the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear sequenced workflow (receive brief → compose thread.json → run render.js → open PNG → edit and re-render) with an explicit validation/re-render feedback loop and accompanying checklists; rendering is non-destructive so no cap applies.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Sectioning is good and the '## Files' table signals a multi-file bundle, but the actual bundle only contains references/1-7.png — the referenced render.js, generate.js, templates/, examples/*.json, and tests/run-all.sh do not exist, and the present references/*.png are never referenced in the body.

3 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, third-person, and clearly distinct, with strong capability coverage. Its main weakness is the absence of an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, which caps completeness at 3.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when creating ChatGPT iOS screenshots for ad creatives, social posts, or product mockups.'

Include common synonyms users might say, such as 'screenshot' or 'fake ChatGPT screen', to broaden trigger-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete capabilities and output formats — 'Render pixel-accurate ChatGPT mobile (iOS) screen mockups', 'Supports user text bubbles, user image attachments, assistant markdown prose, citation chips...', 'Outputs HTML + PNG' — covering the feature surface comprehensively.

5 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is explicit ('Render... mockups... Outputs HTML + PNG') but there is no 'Use when...' or equivalent trigger guidance in the description, which caps completeness at 3 per the rubric guideline.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms a user would say are present ('ChatGPT', 'mobile (iOS) screen mockups', 'HTML', 'PNG'), but common synonyms like 'screenshot' or 'fake ChatGPT' are missing, so it falls short of comprehensive synonym coverage.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is very specific — pixel-accurate ChatGPT iOS mockups from a thread JSON — with distinct triggers and minimal realistic overlap with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 1 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.