Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured body for a simple skill: a verified runnable command, correct bundle references, and no padding. Weaknesses are concentrated in execution completeness — the prompt/length source ("template recipe") is named but never wired to a command or pointer, and there is no post-generation verification step for the paid API call.
Suggestions
Make the recipe lookup executable: state how to fetch the prompt + length from the template recipe (a command, query, or file path) so the '...' placeholder in the Run example can be filled without guessing.
Use the full path in the Run command (scripts/gen_music.py ...) so the entry point is unambiguous within the two-script bundle.
Add a lightweight output check (e.g., confirm duration matches --duration and the file is non-empty) before treating the paid generation as done, and drop the verbatim repetition of the frontmatter description in the intro paragraph.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is very lean (~15 lines) with zero concept explanation, but it is not perfectly token-efficient: the opening paragraph repeats the frontmatter description verbatim, and the billing constraint is stated three times ("bills the Ads agent" in the intro, "bills the agent" in Run, "bills the Ads agent" in Contract). Anchor 4 ("efficient; minor instances... that could be trimmed") fits better than anchor 5's "every token earns its place". | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The Run section gives a real, verified command — "gen_music.py --prompt '...' --duration 10 --out music.m4a" — whose flags match the bundled scripts/gen_music.py. It stops short of anchor 5 ("fully executable; copy-paste ready"): the prompt is an ellipsis placeholder whose source ("the template recipe") is never made executable, and the command omits the scripts/ path. It is above anchor 3 because the command is genuine and runnable once inputs are supplied. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple single-action skill, and the action is mostly unambiguous: run gen_music.py with recipe-supplied prompt and length. It does not reach 5 under the simple-skill exception because the single action is not fully unambiguous — how to obtain the "template recipe (DB)" values is never stated, and there is no checkpoint verifying the generated bed (duration/loudness) after a paid call. It is above anchor 3 because the sequence that is written is clear and correct. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external reference files, and the body is split into well-organized sections (Run, Contract) that correctly point at the actual bundle: both referenced files exist (scripts/gen_music.py, scripts/media_proxy.py) and gen_music.py imports media_proxy as documented. Per the rubric's simple-skill note, this earns the top anchor; the only nit — the Run command not carrying the scripts/ prefix — is too minor to drop it to anchor 4. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |