Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-sequenced, highly actionable workflow with strong validation gates, but it is verbose and monolithic — large templates and tables live inline instead of in reference files. Splitting reusable material into references would improve both conciseness and progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Move the HTML report structure, demo-pattern table, and signal-specific outreach-angle table into reference files (e.g., references/report-template.md, references/demo-patterns.md) and link to them from the body.
Consolidate the repeated 'Present to the user' quote blocks into a single reusable interaction-pattern reference to cut length.
Trim explanatory framing around each phase (e.g., 'The demo alone is strong. The demo PLUS a comparison report…') to leaner directives.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient process guidance without explaining basic concepts, but the ~412-line body repeats prompt-template quote blocks and carries large tables that could be trimmed without losing clarity. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, ready-to-use templates (DEMO CONCEPT block, TEST RESULTS grid, HTML report structure, signal-specific outreach angles) with only minor placeholder gaps appropriate for an instruction skill. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six phases and sixteen numbered steps are explicitly sequenced with validation checkpoints — a test checklist, 'fix any failures before proceeding', user-approval gates, and cost-confirmation feedback loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Headers and phases give good in-page structure, but the body is monolithic with no bundle files; large reusable content (report HTML structure, demo-pattern and outreach-angle tables) is inlined rather than split into one-level-deep references. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |