Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A thorough, highly actionable skill with concrete commands, API calls, and a clear phased workflow culminating in a launch checklist. It is let down by verbosity/redundancy and a monolithic structure with no progressive disclosure into reference files.
Suggestions
Move detailed reference material (headline/description frameworks, match-type matrices, CSV schema) into separate reference files and link to them one level deep.
De-duplicate the 'When to Use' and 'Trigger Phrases' sections, which list near-identical trigger phrasings.
Tighten placeholder tables (e.g. match-type and quick-wins matrices) by replacing bracketed fill-ins with one concrete worked example plus the pattern.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~465-line body mostly delivers valuable domain-specific expertise Claude lacks, but includes redundant sections ('When to Use' and 'Trigger Phrases' overlap) and placeholder tables that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready guidance: concrete search strings, exact API endpoints and JSON payloads (HN Algolia, Apify), character limits (30/90), CSV column headers, and file-naming conventions. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 7-phase sequence (intake through output) with a final launch checklist serving as the validation checkpoint for a complex generative process. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and all reference material (templates, frameworks, CSV format, research methodology) is inline in a long monolithic document; the phase structure is good but content that should be split remains embedded. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |