Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with executable curl examples and accurate API parameters for every endpoint, and is well-organized. Weaknesses are mild verbosity, an implicit rather than explicit OTP verification workflow without retry guidance, and an inlined reference that could be offloaded to a bundled file.
Suggestions
Add an explicit sequenced workflow for the OTP flow (send code -> check code) with a validate/retry checkpoint for the three-attempt limit.
Trim explanatory prose such as the AML background paragraph and reduce repeated curl boilerplate via a shared example.
Consider moving the detailed per-endpoint parameter reference into a bundled REFERENCE.md and pointing to it from the overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with API-specific parameter tables Claude wouldn't otherwise know, but includes some explanatory fluff (e.g., the AML intro about financial fraud/terrorism) and repeated curl boilerplate that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Every capability ships with a complete, copy-paste-ready curl command including the real proxy path, headers, and a concrete request body, plus precise parameter definitions. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The send-then-check OTP sequence is implied rather than explicitly sequenced, and the three-attempt limit is only mentioned in passing without a validate/retry feedback loop for risky operations. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized but the per-endpoint parameter reference is inlined monolithically with no local bundled reference file; only a live 'Discover More' search endpoint is signaled, so content that could be split out remains inline. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |