CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

linkedin-scraper

Get LinkedIn profiles, company pages, and posts

55

Quality

62%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/social/capabilities/linkedin-scraper/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a clean, well-structured guide for a simple three-endpoint API skill: concrete request specs, parameters, response summaries, and error handling are all present. Its main weaknesses are redundant repetition of the full-URL guidance across three sections and the unstated step of constructing a LinkedIn URL from a person's name.

Suggestions

Consolidate the full-URL guidance into one place (the Parameters section) and remove its repetition in How It Works and Tips; drop Tips entries that restate Error Handling.

Add explicit guidance for constructing URLs from user-supplied names (e.g. profile URL is https://linkedin.com/in/<vanity-name>, company URL is https://linkedin.com/company/<company-name>).

Merge the three per-operation Parameter subsections, since all three take the identical single required 'url' parameter, into one line to save tokens.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient, but "Use full LinkedIn URLs (e.g., https://linkedin.com/in/USERNAME)" is stated in three places (How It Works note, Parameters, Tips) and "Some profiles may have restricted visibility" duplicates the Error Handling section — "mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened".

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete YAML request specs with real paths and query parameters plus worked example URLs are directly executable through the referenced runtime, but guidance for mapping a user-supplied name to a profile URL (e.g. the "Look up Satya Nadella" example) is left implicit — "mostly executable guidance with minor gaps".

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Each of the three single-step operations is unambiguous, with a setup prerequisite (read scrapecreators-api) and error-recovery guidance (retry, rate-limit delays); this is a simple non-destructive skill so the validation cap does not apply, but the name-to-URL step and runtime-selection detail are implicit — "clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps".

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well organized and all content (three endpoints) is appropriately inline for a skill with no bundle files, but the Tips section largely repeats earlier material, which is a minor organization gap — "good structure; most content is appropriately placed; minor organization gaps".

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is short, accurate, and unambiguous about its LinkedIn niche, but it omits any "when to use" trigger guidance and uses a single generic action verb with no synonyms. It is serviceable but below the quality of the reference good examples, which pair capabilities with explicit trigger phrases.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause with concrete trigger phrases, e.g. "Use when the user asks to look up, scrape, or research a person's or company's LinkedIn presence, or fetch a specific LinkedIn post."

Replace the generic verb "Get" with more specific actions (e.g. "Scrape/fetch LinkedIn profiles, company pages, and posts") to sharpen the what.

Include natural synonym coverage such as "look up", "find", "search", and "LinkedIn URL" so common user phrasings match.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Get LinkedIn profiles, company pages, and posts" names the domain and three concrete object types, but relies on a single generic verb ("Get"), matching "names domain and 1-2 concrete actions, but not comprehensive" rather than the multiple distinct actions of anchor 4.

3 / 5

Completeness

The "what" is clear (get profiles, company pages, posts) but there is no "Use when..." clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which per the judging guidelines caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"LinkedIn", "profiles", "company pages", and "posts" are terms users naturally say, but the description omits common variations like "look up", "scrape", "search", or "network" — "some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms".

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"LinkedIn" pins the description to a clear niche with distinct triggers (profiles, company pages, posts); it is unlikely to fire for any unrelated skill, matching "clear niche with distinct triggers; minimal conflict risk".

5 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.