Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exceptionally actionable, operationally rigorous body: executable examples, real bundled scripts, and explicit validation/recovery loops for every paid operation. Its weaknesses are density and structure — the digest/dedupe rules are repeated across sections and a large slab of edge-case reference material is inlined monolithically rather than split into reference files.
Suggestions
Move the QA-14 policy-rejection reference detail (error-body shapes, ledger key derivation, charge semantics) and the MCP relay protocol into a references/ file, leaving the body with the rule plus a pointer.
Consolidate the three overlapping explanations of input_digest/dedupe (crash-resume, policy rejections, save-as-you-go) into one section, cross-referenced from the others.
Annotate the eleven_music example's positional args (e.g., duration_ms) and show a one-line download() example since it is imported in the 'Use it' snippet.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Nearly all content is novel, ecosystem-specific knowledge (billing semantics, proxy hosts, ledger keys) that Claude could not know, so it is not padding — but it could still be tightened. The input_digest/dedupe concept is explained three times across 'Crash-resume', 'Policy rejections', and 'Save-as-you-go digest'; narrative incident asides ('a veed/fabric lipsync once finished 26s after a 600s poller quit...') and dense edge-case taxonomy (the full QA-14 error-body shape list) add tokens beyond what the instruction needs. This fits 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened' better than the lean 4 or 5 anchors. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The 'Use it' section gives copy-paste-ready calls with realistic payloads ('fal_generate("fal-ai/nano-banana/edit", {"prompt": p, "image_urls": [product_url], ...})'), the resume and rejection-management CLI commands are exact, the input_digest examples are concrete, and the MCP relay protocol is a precise step-by-step. Minor gaps keep it at 4: 'eleven_music(prompt, 10500, "music.mp3", force_instrumental=True)' leaves the positional args unexplained, 'download' is imported but never shown, and the 'swap any expiring input URL for its ingredient_key + digest' instruction gives no executable helper. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Every multi-step process is clearly sequenced with explicit validation and error-recovery loops: the MCP relay is a numbered 1-4 workflow whose step 4 handles provider failures and prescribes the re-run; crash-resume prescribes re-attach instead of re-fire with resume_fal(request_id) after FalPollTimeout; policy rejections are validated up front via refuse_if_rejected before any upload, and the ledger refuses identical requests before any network call. Paid (financially destructive) operations have feedback loops throughout, matching the 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body references real bundle files (scripts/media_proxy.py and scripts/resume.py both exist, and every referenced function — fal_generate, resume_fal, input_digest, refuse_if_rejected, forget_rejection — is present), and section headers are clear. But everything lives inline in one ~200-line SKILL.md: the QA-14 policy-rejection ledger spec (error-body taxonomy, key derivation, ledger semantics) and the MCP relay protocol are reference-grade material that belongs in separate reference files the main body could point to — the 'content that should be separate is inline' pattern of the 3 anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |