Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, action-oriented overview with executable code, real bundle-file references, and a clearly sequenced crash-resume workflow. The only weakness is mild repetition of the double-bill invariant, which slightly undercuts token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and dense with actionable specifics, but the double-bill warning is restated across the header tagline, the body explanation, and the resume invariant, which could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready examples — real imports, concrete calls with arguments (`fal_generate('fal-ai/nano-banana/edit', {...})`, `eleven_music(prompt, 10500, 'music.mp3', ...)`), and runnable CLI commands. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The crash-resume recovery workflow is explicitly sequenced (`resume.py --list` → `--request-id <id> --out final.mp4`) with a clear error-recovery feedback loop (re-attach instead of re-firing), and the single generation action is unambiguous. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections (Crash-resume, Use it, Contracts, Related) with one-level-deep references to real bundle files (`scripts/resume.py`, `scripts/media_proxy.py`), confirmed present in the bundle. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |