Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, clearly sequenced multi-phase skill with strong templates and validation checkpoints. Its main weakness is mild redundancy in the intro, Cost, and Tools Required sections that could be trimmed.
Suggestions
Trim the 'Cost' and 'Tools Required' sections or merge them — they restate 'pure reasoning, user deploys via own tools' already in the description.
Remove the restated positioning in the intro paragraph since the frontmatter description already covers it.
Consider moving the long Phase 4 output-format template into a reference file to keep the main body as an overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and well-organized, but the intro restates the description and the 'Cost' and 'Tools Required' sections repeat the 'pure reasoning / user deploys via own tools' point already made in the frontmatter. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready variant and output-format templates, concrete per-channel metric lists, a weighted scoring framework, and explicit statistical-significance thresholds covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases 0–4 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (minimum sample sizes, >20% relative-difference rule) and a winner-selection feedback loop guiding the next test. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single, well-sectioned SKILL.md with no bundle files; the large output-format template is reasonably inline but could be split into a reference, leaving minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |