Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced methodology skill with concrete templates, severity calibration, and a real fallback loop. Its main weakness is token efficiency: a motivational intro and redundant scope statements repeat across sections, and the single-file structure leaves the large output template inline.
Suggestions
Trim the opening paragraph and consolidate the "Meta is the final gatekeeper" point so it appears once instead of in both Output Standards and "What This Skill Will Not Do".
Move the Phase 5 output template and the Phase 1 lookup-key tables into a reference file (e.g. references/output-format.md) referenced from the body, slimming the SKILL.md overview.
Consider a one-line "Use when" summary at the top of the body to mirror the frontmatter gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient methodology, but the motivational opener ("Meta disapproves ads for policy reasons constantly...") and repeated "Meta is the final gatekeeper" sentiment across Output Standards and "What This Skill Will Not Do" could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance: exact output template, a three-level severity table, lookup-key trigger tables, and specific caching rules ("3–6 policy-page fetches total, not 30–60"). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear Phase 0–6 sequence with an explicit error-recovery fallback in Phase 2 (404 → site-restricted search → log "policy URL drift") and a grounding gate ("If you can't quote, the finding isn't grounded — drop it"). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized with no nested references, but it is a ~200-line monolith with no bundle files; the large output template and lookup tables could be offloaded into reference files to slim the overview. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |