Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable diagnostic skill with a clear phased workflow and properly signaled one-level-deep reference. Its main weakness is redundancy between the Phase 2–3 lenses and the 'Reference: Domain Concepts' section, which inflates token cost.
Suggestions
Remove or sharply compress the 'Reference: Domain Concepts' section (Breakdown Effect, Learning Phase, Auction Overlap, Pacing, Fluctuations) since each concept is already operationally defined in Phases 2–3; keep only the Creative Fatigue detail that is not covered earlier.
Add a short explicit validation/gate step in Phase 3 (e.g., 'confirm sufficient impressions/sample size before interpreting any ranking or CPA') to make the existing guardrails into a visible checkpoint.
Consider moving the full Metric Naming Standard table into references/ and keeping only the most-used mappings inline, to tighten the SKILL.md overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and specialized, but the 'Reference: Domain Concepts' section re-explains Breakdown Effect, Learning Phase, Auction Overlap, Pacing, and Performance Fluctuations already covered in Phases 2–3, creating noticeable redundancy. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly actionable for an instruction-only skill: a concrete evaluation-level table, learning thresholds (~50 events, 17+5 shops), six diagnostic lenses with spotting/action guidance, a metric-naming map, and a copy-paste report template cover the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-phase sequence (Intake → Evaluation Level → Learning → Diagnose → Synthesize → Report) with per-phase 'Output for this phase' checkpoints and explicit guardrails, though explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loops are not present (acceptable for non-destructive analysis). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | One real reference file (references/customer-journey-coverage.md) is clearly signaled with markdown links and kept one level deep, but a fair amount of reference-style content (domain concepts, metric table) is inlined rather than split out. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |