Conciseness

The body is dense and assumes competence — no explanation of librosa, ffmpeg, or captioning concepts; nearly every sentence carries a project-specific rule. Minor trimming is needed: the opening paragraphs restate the frontmatter description almost verbatim, and the QC bullet duplicates the same parenthetical twice ('off the chosen look — in the felt demo, felt → smooth-3D'). Not 5 because of that redundancy; not 3 because there is no concept over-explanation and almost all tokens earn their place.

Actionability

Concrete guidance throughout: named inputs ('word-timestamps.json', 'bars.json', the brand wordmark SVG), exact filter strings ('overlay=…:enable=\'between(t,st,en)\'', 'loudnorm I=-14'), a fallback path for hosts lacking libass, and specific QC artifacts (2 fps contact sheet, per-bar FACE and HAND crops). Falls short of anchor 5 because the body itself contains no executable commands — the real command-level detail (stitch.py, ffmpeg invocations) lives in the bundle files — and short of a copy-paste-ready standard.

Workflow Clarity

The sequence is clear (song → librosa bar grid → keyframes → one clip per bar → assembly → mux) and validation is explicitly present: per-scene QC with the two named failure modes, an error-recovery loop ('A drifted bar means regenerating that bar's KEYFRAME (not re-cutting)'), and a post-publish re-check of the served bytes. Anchor 4 fits: most checkpoints present with minor gaps, since the fully ordered step-by-step map is delegated to scripts/PIPELINE.md rather than sequenced inline.

Progressive Disclosure

All three referenced bundle files (scripts/config.example.json, scripts/PIPELINE.md, scripts/README.md) exist, are one level deep, and are introduced with a stated purpose ('PIPELINE.md maps every config block to its source step and README.md documents the free assembly'). Not 5 because the Contract section substantially duplicates scripts/README.md sections 1–5 (captions, cut-to-bar, logo bug/end card, ffmpeg composite, QC) rather than pointing to them, an organization gap; not 3 because the split between overview and worked example is real and well-signaled.

Specificity

Lists many concrete actions with comprehensive coverage — 'cut to their BAR window from librosa beat-tracking and hard-concatenated on the bar', 'VEED-whisper white bold-sans captions in the BOTTOM third', 'a persistent brand logo bug', 'closed on a solid-brand-color PIL end card', 'song mux'. Every assembly action is named specifically; no generic filler, so it clearly matches the top anchor rather than the 'minor gaps' anchor at 4.

Completeness

The 'what' is explicit and detailed, and a 'Use for the cartoon-music-video format' clause answers 'when'. Anchor 4 fits: both present but the 'when' is a single narrow clause rather than concrete trigger phrases like 'when the user mentions X'. Not 5 because the when-guidance lacks the concrete trigger phrasing of the top example; not 3 because the when-clause is explicit, not merely implied.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms like 'cartoon', 'animated', 'hand-crafted', 'music-video ad' are present and would be said by users, but the description is dominated by internal jargon (i2v clips, librosa, VEED-whisper, Alignment 2, PIL) and omits common phrasings like 'animated video' or 'video ad'. Good coverage with a few natural terms missing fits anchor 4; not 3 because the natural keywords are genuinely there, not 5 because synonyms/variations users actually say are thin.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche — the FREE deterministic assembly stage — and it explicitly partitions the paid sibling capabilities ('the song, character, keyframes, and clips come from create-music-elevenlabs / create-image-fal / create-video-fal'), so it is unlikely to trigger for the wrong skill. Matches the top anchor: distinct triggers, minimal conflict risk.