Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, action-oriented body that points cleanly to real bundled scripts and a config example. Its weakness is the absence of an output-validation step for a batch render, which limits workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verify step after render, e.g. 'Verify: ffprobe the output, confirm duration is 10-20s and resolution is 1080x1920; re-run if claims are dropped or pacing is off.'
De-duplicate the 'FREE / no paid calls' note so it appears once (either intro or contract) to tighten conciseness toward a 5.
Clarify the minimal required config fields inline (skus, value_props, palette) so a user can assemble a valid config without opening config.example.json first.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and assumes Claude's competence — never explains what FFmpeg/Playwright/PIL are — with only minor restatement (the 'FREE / no paid calls' note appears in both the intro and the contract). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives an executable run command with concrete output path and environment overrides (RENDER_PYTHON, FFMPEG), plus a real config.example.json; fully config-driven so the lack of an inline snippet is justified, leaving only minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The render is a batch output-producing operation but the workflow has no validation/verification checkpoint (e.g. confirm the mp4 plays, check duration lands in the 10-20s window), which per the rubric caps this dimension at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into Run and Contract sections with clearly signaled, one-level-deep references to bundled scripts; all referenced files (render_master.py, render_hyperframe.py, build_storyboard_preview.py, build_text_overlays.py, config.example.json) are real and present, with only minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |