Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, expert-directed body with exact technical parameters, a clean four-step pipeline, and an appropriately compact single-file structure backed by a real script bundle. The main gap is validation: a batch composite/mux pipeline lacks any output-verification or feedback-loop step, and invocation syntax is never shown end-to-end.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification checkpoint after compositing and after muxing (e.g. probe each variant with ffprobe to confirm video duration and audio bitrate > 1 kbps, and re-run the separate mux pass if not) to close the batch-operation validation gap.
Include one complete example invocation for the pipeline (e.g. 'python3 scripts/strip_product_backgrounds.py --config config.json' with the expected output paths) so the Run section is copy-paste executable.
Consolidate the FREE/paid routing notes — stated in Run steps 1 and 4, the Contract, and the Gaps section — into the single Gaps section to remove repetition and tighten the body further.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes competence throughout — zero concept explanations, every line carries pipeline facts (e.g. 'BG (palette-aware dim) → cold-open overlay → cutouts (width-anchored, vertically centered y=(H-h)/2) → end card. h264 crf20 yuv420p +faststart 30fps'). Not 5 because the FREE/paid routing notes repeat across the Run steps, the Contract, and the Gaps section, which could be consolidated. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete and near-executable: named scripts verified to exist in scripts/, exact parameters ('saturation=0.50', 'crf20 yuv420p +faststart 30fps', '-map 0:v:0 -map 1:a:0'), a full config lookup order ('--config <path>, $VIGNETTE_CONFIG, <project>/config.json or scripts/config.json'), and defined error behavior ('exits naming any missing required field'). Not 5 because no complete copy-paste invocation example is given (e.g. 'python3 scripts/composite_variants.py --config config.json'). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step Run sequence is clearly ordered with concrete per-step outputs, and config validation exists ('exits naming any missing required field — there are no built-in demo values'). However, this is a batch pipeline (one composite per BG variant, cutouts per SKU) with no output verification or fix-and-retry loop after compositing or muxing — the body even documents a silent failure mode ('single-pass composite+mux silently ships 1 kbps garbage audio') without adding a check for it, so the batch-operation cap applies. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is ~35 lines, tightly organized into Run / Choices / Contract / Gaps sections, and the four bundled scripts are each referenced one level deep by exact filename and all verified present in scripts/. No separate reference files are needed at this size, which matches the well-organized-sections criterion for compact skills. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |