seo-content-audit

Comprehensive SEO footprint analysis. Catalogs all content, pulls real SEO metrics (via Apify Semrush/Ahrefs scrapers or free web search probes), runs competitor analysis, builds topic/keyword and content-type gap matrices, and produces a prioritized recommendations report. The complete SEO audit for any company.

Quality

62%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/seo/composites/seo-content-audit/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, sequenced audit process with concrete phases and table formats, but it is weakened by verbose inline templating, missing executable specifics (no Apify actor IDs or actual scripts), and absent validation checkpoints for a batch data-gathering workflow.

Suggestions

Move the full output template into a separate reference file (e.g. references/output-template.md) and link to it from a short inline summary, reducing SKILL.md token load.

Add explicit validation checkpoints after data-gathering phases (e.g. 'verify sitemap parsed N pages; if 0, fall back to RSS/blog index') to support error recovery in this batch workflow.

Specify the actual Apify actor IDs or concrete web-search probe steps instead of generically referring to 'scripts' that do not exist in the bundle.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Process guidance is mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence, but the ~190-line inline output template (lines 143-329) and a slightly redundant intro line that restates the description add noticeable bulk that could be trimmed or externalized.	3 / 5
Actionability	Gives concrete process steps and named data sources (Apify Semrush/Ahrefs scrapers, sitemap.xml), but references 'scripts' and Apify scrapers without naming actor IDs or giving executable commands, leaving key execution details unspecified.	3 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The seven phases are clearly sequenced, but this batch operation (crawling a domain plus 3-5 competitors, pulling SEO metrics) has no explicit validation/verification checkpoints for data completeness or quality, capping workflow clarity at 3.	3 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Has good section structure (Quick Start, Inputs, Cost, Phases, Output Template, Tips), but no bundle files exist and the large output template plus appendix-referenced files (content-inventory.md, seo-profile.md, brand-voice.md) are neither present nor clearly signaled as separate navigable references, so content that should be split remains inline.	3 / 5
	Total	12 / 20 Passed

Description

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A specific, well-scoped description that concretely enumerates the audit's actions and is clearly distinct from other skills. Its main weakness is the absence of an explicit 'Use when' trigger clause, which caps completeness.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when the user wants an SEO content audit, content gap analysis, or competitor content comparison for a company or domain.'

Include a couple of common user synonyms (e.g. 'keyword research', 'rank tracking', 'organic traffic audit') to broaden natural trigger coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple concrete actions — 'Catalogs all content, pulls real SEO metrics', 'runs competitor analysis', 'builds topic/keyword and content-type gap matrices', 'produces a prioritized recommendations report' — with comprehensive coverage of the audit workflow.	5 / 5
Completeness	The 'what' is clearly and thoroughly described, but there is no explicit 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance; the closing 'The complete SEO audit for any company' is a tagline, not a trigger, which caps completeness at 3.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural phrases users would say ('SEO audit', 'competitor analysis', 'SEO metrics', 'gap matrices') with good coverage, but misses common synonyms like 'keyword research', 'rank tracking', or 'organic traffic'.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Occupies a clear niche — SEO content audit with competitor gap matrices — with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills; minimal conflict risk.	5 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: gooseworks-ai/goose-skills
Path: skills/seo/composites/seo-content-audit/SKILL.md
Commit: 2523432

Reviewed: 5 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.