Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A thorough, actionable SEO analysis playbook with concrete queries and a clear phased workflow. Its main weaknesses are verbosity in the output template and implicit rather than explicit validation checkpoints between phases.
Suggestions
Move the full Phase 7 output template into a references/ file and keep only a short skeleton inline, reducing body length and improving progressive disclosure.
Add brief validation/checkpoint notes between phases (e.g., 'Confirm at least N keywords probed before estimating traffic') to make the workflow's feedback loops explicit.
Tighten the Inputs table and Quick Start example to remove overlapping information.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and free of concept padding Claude already knows, but the ~50-line output template and some redundancy between the Inputs table and Quick Start example could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, runnable WebSearch/WebFetch queries, specific URLs (similarweb.com/website/[domain], web.archive.org), and a worked example; minor gaps remain because many queries use [domain]/[keyword] placeholders rather than fully copy-paste-ready form. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-phase sequence with each phase listing searches to run and data to extract; validation checkpoints are largely implicit rather than explicit, but the skill is read-only so the destructive-cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections (Quick Start, Inputs, Cost, Process, Tips, Limitations) with no external bundle files needed; the long inline output template is the main piece that could be split out. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |