Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable with executable API calls and a clear phased workflow, but held back by redundant sections (duplicated trigger phrases and prerequisites) that hurt conciseness.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicate 'Trigger Phrases' section (it restates 'When to Use') and merge any unique phrasings into that earlier section.
Consolidate 'Tools Required' with 'Prerequisites' to eliminate the repeated APIFY_API_TOKEN / web_search / HN-API listing.
Add a brief error-recovery note for when an Apify run fails or a platform scan returns nothing, to give the workflow an explicit feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The operational core (API calls, scoring table, output template) is efficient, but the Trigger Phrases section duplicates 'When to Use', 'Tools Required' duplicates 'Prerequisites', and the 'Core principle' line is marketing padding — several sections could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready guidance throughout: web_search query templates with site: filters, full Apify POST/GET requests with JSON payloads, HN Algolia URLs with query params, a weighted scoring table, and a complete output markdown template. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear phased sequence (Phase 0 Intake → 1 Scanning → 2 Scoring → 3 Hooks → 4 Output) with an explicit checkpoint (poll Apify until status SUCCEEDED), but no error-recovery feedback loops for failed scrapes or empty results. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly labeled sections and self-contained; no bundle files exist (references/scripts/assets absent), so the ~290-line monolithic body is a minor gap but content is appropriately sectioned rather than nested. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |