Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is strong: fully executable, well-structured, and easy to follow, with only minor conciseness redundancy and a slightly long inline response-reference section preventing a perfect score.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient with executable curl commands, a compact result table, and field lists; minor redundancy between the intro line ('Check if an email address is valid...') and the 'How It Works' section keeps it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready curl commands for both Hunter and Tomba with concrete example emails, a parameters section, and worked user-prompt examples fully cover the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a single-purpose verify call with an unambiguous action and a Result Types table mapping each status to a concrete action, the simple-skill exception applies; no destructive/batch validation cap is triggered by the core operation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear section headers and no nested references, but the lengthy inline Hunter/Tomba response-field dictionaries are inline material that could arguably be split, leaving a minor organization gap below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |