Content
50%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured and mostly actionable, but malformed curl examples, duplicated parameter blocks, and a lack of validation steps for the async research flow hold it back. Moving the verbose endpoint reference into a bundled file would improve progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Fix the broken JSON in the /search, /findSimilar, and /contents curl examples so the body fields are inside a single valid JSON object passed to -d.
Extract the repeated parameter lists (dates, domains, includeText/excludeText) into a shared reference file and link to it from each endpoint to reduce duplication.
Add an explicit poll-until-done workflow with a validation checkpoint (check status, retry if not finished) for the create-task / get-task research flow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient API documentation, but the ~10-parameter date/filter blocks are duplicated verbatim across /search and /findSimilar, padding tokens with repeated content. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Curl commands are provided for every endpoint, but the /search, /findSimilar, and /contents examples close the JSON object early and leave fields like "query" dangling outside it, so the code is not copy-paste executable. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The async create-then-poll research flow is implied, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops for polling a task to completion. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are organized by endpoint, but roughly 200 lines of inline API reference belong in a separate bundled file and there are no one-level-deep references to navigate to. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |