Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, expert-level contract document that is highly specific, free of filler, and strong on validation via a detailed test inventory and executable commands. Its main structural weakness is that all contract detail lives inline in SKILL.md with no progressive disclosure into reference files, and a few sentences trade clarity for compression.
Suggestions
Move stable contract detail (the route table, cookie/security semantics, lifecycle rules) into a reference file (e.g. references/contract.md) and keep SKILL.md as configuration quick-start plus navigation, matching the sibling-skill pattern already linked.
Show the `localdb` identity-store declaration and the `authenticate with myportal` mount together as one complete runnable example instead of describing the missing pieces in prose.
Relax the most compressed sentences (e.g. refresh-family rotation, requester-secret separation) with a short clarifying clause each so a single read conveys the constraint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Nearly every sentence carries a non-obvious domain constraint ("Oversize is 413, unsupported media is 415", "limited to 1024 per portal and eight per trusted source IP") with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Not 5 because a few passages are compressed to the point of needing rereading ("Rotation of a live approver refresh family remains valid") and some detail (AbortController API constraints) could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides complete executable Caddyfile blocks, a copy-paste `make test TEST='^TestPortalCrossDevice|^TestCaddyCrossDeviceE2E'` command, a concrete path/method/behavior table, and named test functions. Not 5 because key setup detail is referenced but not shown ("Declare `localdb` separately" without an example) and most guidance is guardrail-style rather than a complete end-to-end recipe. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear topical progression (configuration → routing/browser contract → identity/lifecycle → acceptance) culminating in an explicit test-selection procedure with a concrete command and per-change guidance. Not 5 because the sequence is implicit rather than numbered and there is no validate-fix-retry loop spelled out; not 3 because validation checkpoints are prominently and concretely specified. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Headers, a route table, and two clearly signaled one-level-deep links to sibling skills give reasonable structure, but the entire ~175-line contract (endpoint semantics, cookie attributes, lifecycle rules, test inventory) is inlined in SKILL.md with no bundle files at all. This matches anchor 3 — content that could live in separate reference files is inline. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |