Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable workflow with explicit validation and recovery loops and appropriate externalization of templates and source policy. Main weaknesses are mild conciseness redundancy and inline detail that could be pushed deeper into references.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the 投稿形式要求 guidance between the 调研 and 成稿 sections — keep the canonical spec in one place and reference it from the other to trim tokens.
Move the long 调研 checklist and 成稿 report-requirements list into a reference file (e.g. references/research-checklist.md) so SKILL.md stays a lean overview.
Tighten or externalize the 公共硬约束 boilerplate block so only skill-specific constraints remain inline in SKILL.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and task-specific with no basic-concept padding, but there is noticeable redundancy (投稿形式要求 detailed in both the 调研 checklist and the 成稿 requirements) and a sizable boilerplate 公共硬约束 block that could be tightened; not a 4 because these could be trimmed without losing clarity. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides executable init_workspace.py and validate_report.py invocations with arguments, a concrete sources.json schema, and pointers to complete templates/policies; minor gaps remain because the research steps themselves are instructional guidelines rather than deterministic code, and script paths use a /path/to/ placeholder. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced pipeline (输入→初始化→调研→成稿→验证→输出→校验) with an explicit validate_report.py checkpoint, a 失败与恢复 feedback section, and concrete checklists (报告必须包含, 可执行清单); validation is present so the destructive/batch cap does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md acts as an overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep references (references/source-policy.md, references/report-template.md) that are real bundle files, and scripts are split out; not a 5 because substantial inline checklists (调研 list, 成稿 requirements) could partly be externalized to reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |