Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strong, decision-focused body: concrete tool guidance, explicit validation before batch operations, and antipattern callouts. Weaknesses are minor — duplicated coverage between dedicated sections and 'Common Mistakes', and create-call examples that omit the task payload.
Suggestions
Consolidate the duplicate coverage: keep the ScheduledTaskWait-on-scheduled-task and Bash-sleep-polling warnings in one place (either the dedicated sections or 'Common Mistakes') and cross-reference from the other.
Add one complete copy-paste ScheduledTaskManage create example showing the full payload (action, title, description, schedule/skipPlanConfirm) so create calls need no inference.
Move the cron expression reference and/or the mistakes catalog into a reference file to shorten the main SKILL.md body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section carries decision guidance about a proprietary tool system Claude cannot already know, with no concept over-teaching. However, two topics (ScheduledTaskWait on scheduled tasks, and Bash sleep + polling) are each explained twice — once in a dedicated section and again in 'Common Mistakes' — which could be consolidated. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete tool names, actions, field values (skipPlanConfirm:true, timeoutSec:60, intervalMs:1800000), real cron expressions, and a copy-ready resolve call cover the common cases. The create examples elide the task payload ('ScheduledTaskManage(action:'create', skipPlanConfirm:true, ...)'), so no fully complete copy-paste create call is shown. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences are explicit with validation checkpoints ('Look before you leap: call ScheduledTaskStatus {} first... confirm the blast radius' before bulk ops) and error-recovery paths (Wait timeout options with 'at most twice, then hand off'). Destructive/batch workflows all include a status-check-first step, so no cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized with clear headers and the content is cohesive for a single file, but the ~190-line body inlines material (cron reference, mistakes catalog, two-phase rationale) that could live in reference files. No bundle files exist, so this is scored on structure alone — good but not the clean split-and-navigate pattern of the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |