Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exceptionally actionable and clearly sequenced TDD workflow — complete executable examples, mandatory red/green verification with feedback loops, and a final checklist. Its weaknesses are redundancy between the 'common excuses' table and 'danger signals' list (conciseness), and a broken progressive-disclosure structure: the promised writing-good-tests.md reference does not exist in the bundle while reference-worthy content stays inlined.
Suggestions
Create the referenced writing-good-tests.md file (or remove the link) — the body promises '阅读 [writing-good-tests.md](writing-good-tests.md)' but no such file exists in the bundle.
Merge the '常见借口' table and '危险信号' list, which enumerate the same rationalizations twice, and trim the essay-length full-suite paragraph at line 190 to its operative rule.
Move the detailed test-quality criteria and the excuses catalogue into the reference file, keeping SKILL.md to the cycle, examples, and checklist.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The workflow steps and code examples are tight and earn their tokens, but the '常见借口' table (12 rows) and the '危险信号' list (13 items) repeat the same rationalizations twice with motivational padding ("那是在给自己找借口", "删除就是删除"), and the full-suite paragraph at line 190 is essay-length. This is 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened' rather than the minor-trimming of anchor 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable TypeScript test examples, concrete commands ('npm test path/to/test.test.ts'), a complete worked bug-fix example showing expected FAIL then PASS output, a verification checklist, and a concrete troubleshooting table — copy-paste ready and covering the common cases. Not 4: there are no gaps in executability for an instruction skill. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The red → verify-red → green → verify-green → refactor cycle has explicit mandatory validation checkpoints ("必须执行。绝不跳过"), error-recovery feedback loops ("测试报错了？修复错误，重新运行直到它正确地失败"), a full-suite verification requirement before declaring done, a cycle diagram, and a final checklist — exactly the anchor-5 pattern of explicit validation steps, feedback loops, and a checklist. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body links to [writing-good-tests.md](writing-good-tests.md) as its one external reference, but no such file exists anywhere in the bundle (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories), so navigation to the reference fails. Meanwhile substantial content that belongs in a reference file (the 12-row excuses table, test-quality criteria) is inlined, making SKILL.md a ~330-line near-monolith — matching 'content that clearly belongs in separate files is inlined'. Not 3, because the one clearly signaled reference is broken rather than merely under-organized. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |