Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tightly written, well-structured instruction skill that avoids concept padding and gives a concrete workflow plus a copy-ready output template. The only real gap is a worked example of the filled-in brief to maximize actionability.
Suggestions
Add one short filled-in example of the Offer brief template (e.g. using the Northstar Relay fixture) so the output format is unambiguous.
Tighten the Quality check into an explicit pass/fail checklist to push workflow_clarity toward 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: no concept tutorials, no padding, each section (Purpose, Required inputs, Workflow, Output format, Guardrails, Quality check) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides a concrete, numbered workflow and a copy-ready markdown output template with explicit field labels (Fact/Inference/Missing, Excluded claims); minor gap is the absence of a worked example showing the template filled in. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five-step Workflow is clearly sequenced with a labeling/checkpoint step (step 2) and a closing Quality check section that acts as a validation gate; not a level-5 explicit validate->fix->retry feedback loop, and the brief is non-destructive so no cap applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, no bundle files present; the content is well-organized into clear sections with no nested references, which per the simple-skill scoring note earns a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |