Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tightly written, highly actionable procedure with strong validation gates, clear sequencing, and clean section structure. The only gap is the absence of a worked example draft that would make guidance fully copy-paste ready.
Suggestions
Add a short worked example showing the labeled draft output (e.g., a sample "DRAFT FOR HUMAN REVIEW — NOT BOOKED" block) to raise actionability to fully copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no concept-explanation padding; every section and token earns its place and assumes Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete gate decisions, exact labels (e.g., "DRAFT FOR HUMAN REVIEW — NOT BOOKED"), a structured input checklist, and an output schema, but lacks a literal copy-paste example draft. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven clearly sequenced steps with explicit validation checkpoints (hard gates in steps 2-3, input validation in step 4), trace-to-source routing, and terminal feedback states. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single-purpose skill under 50 lines with well-organized sections and no need for external bundle files, satisfying the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |